Judge Rules D122 Member Kathy Miller Back on April Ballot (UPDATE)

The notary error on the petition was determined to be insufficient to eliminate incumbent Kathy Miller from the New Lenox school board ballot, a Will County judge ruled.

Will County Judge John Anderson ruled Monday that Kathy Miller, New Lenox School District 122 board member, will be back on the April 2013 ballot.

The judge found the petition to be sufficient to stand after a three-member panel of Miller's fellow board members voted 2-1 to kick her off the ballot.

"It was not a fatal error," said Board President Nick DiSandro, who attended the hearing.  

Miller later issued a statement: "I am proud and honored to serve both the children and the taxpayers of this community as a School Board Member and I am ecstatic that I have the opportunity to ask that the voters allow me to do so for another term. Unfortunately, the events leading up to today's verdict were an attack meant to tarnish my reputation and an infringement on my rights as an  citizen.

"I find it unacceptable the amount of money, time and energy that was spent on this issue and that it took away from our core mission of educating the children of New Lenox and maintaining outstanding schools. My goal is to see that this is the last time our resources are wasted in such a shameful manner."

Broderick has not returned calls to Patch.

She was temporarily kicked off after a Jan. 11 hearing of the New Lenox School District 122 Electoral Board, which voted 2-1 in favor of upholding an objection to a notary error on her nomination petition.

The decision by the electoral board unleashed an outcry from Miller supporters and accusations of foul play. According to the objection, the notary on page four of the five-page document was faulty.

The page was struck from the petition, which worked to invalidate the 12 voter signatures. This left Miller six short of the minimum 50 signatures needed for a position on the ballot.

Read more coverage:

  • D122 Member Kathy Miller Kicked Off April Election Ballot
  • Anonymous Tip Led to D122 Petition Objection (UPDATE)
  • Candidate Petition for New Lenox School District Challenged; Hearing Set for Friday
  • D122 Board President Says Fellow Member Was Behind Kathy Miller Objection

DiSandro, who was one of three to sit on the Electoral Board, called a press conference on Jan. 15, where he announced that board member Maureen Broderick had a hand in filing the objection to incumbent Miller's petition for the April election.

The Electoral Board was comprised of DiSandro, Broderick and Vice President Sue Smith. Smith and Broderick went against the advice of the school district's attorney, who cited legal precedent as a reason to ignore "clerical errors" involving petition notaries.  

In response to the judge's ruling today, Smith said: "I did my duty and the judge did his; now I'm looking forward to getting our focus back to business."

After the ruling was announced, DiSandro said, "At this point, I think the judge did what was right—reviewed the case and made the right decision based on law. And we move on."  

DiSandro said the objection to Miller's election petition was politically motivated and embarrassing. At the press conference, he shared details of a phone conversation with Broderick he had on Jan. 3, the day the objection to Miller's petition was filed.

DiSandro said Broderick reviewed the petitions of those who filed for the April 2013 school board election and filed objections to the documents turned in by Miller, an incumbent, and Thomas Hottinger. 

"She wrote both statements but she did not sign (the one against Miller)," DiSandro said.

That objection was signed by . DiSandro said Broderick didn't sign the objection against Miller, because she wanted to remain seated on the Electoral Board. She also withdrew her objection to Hottinger's petition so she could sit on the board. 

When asked to respond to DiSandro's accusations, Broderick said, "I never told him I wrote it. I never told him that at all. I'm extremely upset that this whole thing is coming to bite me. The main focus is on me now; it should be on Miller. I had nothing to do with what he is alleging that I did."

At the Jan. 16 NLSD122 meeting, DiSandro again publicly attacked the legitimacy of a Jan. 11 hearing that resulted in removing Miller from the April ballot.

Then one-by-one, with the exception of Broderick and Smith, board members expressed their disappointment over the way the hearing and the events surrounding it have played out. Board members Debbie Kedzior, Bill Pender, Miller and Patrick Martino united in chastising Broderick. Kedzior said she was embarrassed by the board's actions this week.

Sign up for breaking news on New Lenox Patch. Like New Lenox Patch on Facebook.

Linda Carson January 28, 2013 at 10:46 PM
Glad that's all behind us and hope they can work together without any hard feelings.
Kimberly January 28, 2013 at 10:56 PM
Looks like this backfired on Smith and Broderick. They look like fools and Miller is back on the ballot and will most likely retain her seat. Wonder if Smith and Broderick will be as lucky???
Cat January 28, 2013 at 11:30 PM
I know I'm not voting for Broderick or smith! They are too immature.
Marie January 28, 2013 at 11:35 PM
I will not vote for any incumbent
Debbie January 28, 2013 at 11:48 PM
Is NOT voting for all incumbents the real answer for good government? We need to look at their voting practices and "behavior." if they have not preformed to high, professional standards, THEN they should not be reelected to their post.
Marie January 29, 2013 at 12:00 AM
Yes, Debbie, I have looked at their voting record and their behavior, and I don't think any incumbent deserves my vote.
Crystal Jensen January 29, 2013 at 12:39 AM
What I find interesting is right here in the posts. All prior stories posted on this "event" have been filled with comments by two people with innocuous name tags. Both were so militant in their unwavering support for Ms. Miller's removal from the ballot and now, they fall silent. Makes one wonder if these two posters were the two ladies from the board in question.....hummmmmmm........
Ashlee January 29, 2013 at 01:08 AM
I am glad to see that the personal and sneaky antics that Broderick used have come to show her true colors. It is so sad and unfortunate that our tax paying dollars were needed for this nonsense. Broderick should personally be held fiscally responsible for this. She should have had the taxpayers best interest in mind, and she didn't. Shame on her-it's disgusting. Her and sue smith need to go. I look forward to seeing new and fresh faces on the board.
Susan January 29, 2013 at 01:31 AM
It is TIME to elect someone who will NOT only vote for what Dr. Sass wants!!!
Kimberly January 29, 2013 at 01:35 AM
Ashlee, you bring up a good point. I wonder exactly how much this nonsense cost the taxpayers?
Marie January 29, 2013 at 01:43 AM
paul allen January 29, 2013 at 01:44 AM
who was billed for the attorney's fees for this mess?
Marie January 29, 2013 at 01:55 AM
Good question Paul - just like that silly psychology mumbojumbo a certain board member thought would be worth our tax dollars to waste on how adult board members could get along better.
Amanda Bowl January 29, 2013 at 03:23 AM
Glad I don't live in New Lenox!
Linda Carson January 29, 2013 at 04:37 AM
We're glad you don't live here, as well. As you can see from the article, we have too much immaturity in town already.
Debbie January 29, 2013 at 12:53 PM
Actually, my comment was for voting in elections in general. I have heard that comment too often from people dealing with other political offices-not voting for ANY incumbent. I, too, am disappointed in the behavior and somewhat personal agendas that have been going on in District 122. For several years now there seems to be a power struggle and the voting has been more for/against PEOPLE rather than issues!!! What is best for the kids has come second!!
Lea Bowes January 29, 2013 at 01:07 PM
Let us all remember the sneaky, underhanded, disdainful things Sue and Broderick have done that cost us, the tax payers money! The image of Broderick sneaking to Nikki Sanders mailbox in the middle of the night is still in my head. We need people on the board who put the children first. Please let us all remember this!!!! We are being taxed for the schools, and our children. Not to pay legal fees for Maureen Brodericks agenda!!!
Scott Moss January 29, 2013 at 04:21 PM
I love when total deceptiveness turns into complete embarrassment. Broderick and Smith are getting what they deserve. The wrath of the community.
Marie January 29, 2013 at 06:35 PM
The entire board deserves the wrath of the community, the way they've been carrying on for so many years.
John Petrosky January 29, 2013 at 10:48 PM
Lots of comments here (and on other stories) -- but how many CANDIDATES? Seats up for grabs...by whom? I'm not commenting on the current issue because a.) I've honestly (who can honestly say "honestly" these days?) not followed the issue close enough and b.) I'm not willing to pick up a petition for candidacy and go around to get the signatures and then actually get elected and serve on the board. It takes a lot of time, effort and other resources for relatively little compensation; these people (largely) are doing it to serve the community the best that they can. Anyone else making all the complaints willing to do the same? Again, not saying that any board member here is right or wrong on this issue -- but THEY ARE THE ONES ACTIVELY SERVING AS VOTED IN BY YOU! Don't like what they do, don't vote for them; run for the seat yourself. Just sayin`....
triton189 January 30, 2013 at 01:30 PM
New Lenox schools have had to pay over 9,000 dollars so far for this legal mess that Broderick and Smith created.
Ed February 03, 2013 at 11:28 PM
That's why I have liked Broderick and Smith. We need more people on the board who will vote as a taxpayer and parent, for the taxpayers and parents, and not a crony of the system.
New Lenox Mom February 07, 2013 at 09:53 PM
Personally I think Broderick and Smith are the only two to do what is right for the kids in this district. They have consistently stood up for the children in this community and against the rubber stamping of other members of this board. Did not vote for Miller last time and won't do it this time. It's bad enough watching members of congress let the power go to their heads but really this school board tops them all.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something