Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan (D-Chicago) on Wednesday dropped his controversial proposal to shift the costs of teacher pensions from the state to local school districts, universities and community colleges.
The announcement came after two days of spirited debate over pension reform in both the House and Senate.
Madigan's plan, which was part of Senate Bill 1673, was widely criticized by Republicans, and threatened to derail other legislation to address the state's massive pension shortfall.
Madigan said he reached the decision after Gov. Pat Quinn asked him to drop the amendment, the Associated Press reports.
“He agrees with the Republicans. He thinks that we ought to remove the issue of the shift of normal cost out of the bill,” Madigan told the House on Wednesday night. “I disagree with the governor, but he is the governor. This is his request.”
Quinn's request was a shift from his previous position. Jerry Stermer, the governor's budget director, told Illinois Statehouse News that "forcing school districts and colleges to pay employees' retirement benefits is the responsible thing to do" since school boards negotiate teachers' pay.
Stermer added that the governor would support anything that could fix the state's unfunded pension liability.
The bill was handed over to House Republican Leader Tom Cross of Oswego, who slammed Madigan on Tuesday, calling his proposal a "poison pill" to kill pension legislation.
Plans to remove Madigan's amendment will be considered by a House Panel on Thursday, the Chicago Tribune reports.
Illinois currently has an $83 billion unfunded pension liability—$44 billion of which is from the Teachers' Retirement System.
With the cost-shift language off the table, lawmakers could vote on a comprehensive pension reform plan before the legislative session ends Thursday night.
Before Wednesday's announcement, .
Business manager Harold Huang estimated it could cost District 122 aout $1.6 million this year, and he asked board members and the public to write New Lenox Rep. Renee Kosel and Sen. Christine Radogno in opposition of the proposal.
"They're trying to pass the buck," Huang said of the state. "We believe it won’t be good for our property taxpayers. If it hits we will need to make cuts and increase property taxes."