patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

NLSD122 Approves Estimated Tax Levy Resolution; Not All Board Members Agree

Taxpayer burdens are cause concern when it comes to approving a tax levy at NLSD122.

 

The New Lenox School District 122 Board of Education approved the 2012 tax levy estimate resolution Nov. 28, but not without discussion about the burden taxpayers in New Lenox face.

Approval of the estimated resolution—a total levy of $45,431,208—was achieved by a vote of 5-2. The two naysayers, Board of Education Vice President Sue Smith and Board Member Maureen Broderick, asked for more information about the financial consequences of holding the line on taxes. Last year both Smith and Broderick opposed the 2011 tax levy.  

The current proposal is 4.03 percent or just over $1.75 million over last year's rate, according to Harold Huang, business manager. This translates to a $45 increase for the average owner of a $230,000 home. The average homeowner in New Lenox is currently paying roughly $2,500 a year in taxes to keep the district's 12 schools operating.

Broderick asked administrators to prepare alternative proposals; ones that reflect a reduced tax burden on the community. She requested some financial scenarios be prepared in time for the board's workshop session on the district's financial operations on Dec. 6.

Smith said she was concerned about the burden on the taxpayer as well. She told administrators, "show me the pros and cons" of reducing the levy. Smith directed Supt. Michael Sass and Huang to try to find budgetary cuts.

At the meeting, she said, "I just basically think it unsustainable. I don't think increasing the tax levy every year is sustainable." Pointing to the economic strains that families have endured over the past four years, she said, "I don't think it's sustainable….my responsibility is to the taxpayer too."

Broderick later said she is hoping that fresh "brainstorming" might stir some creative ways to cut the budget and reduce the levy before the actual vote, which is scheduled for Dec. 19. On the heels of an Illinois Board of Education Convention, Broderick said she had attended a tax levy workshop in which some alternatives to raising the levy to the maximum were introduced. "I asked for the Power Point," she said, "and I gave it Harold (Huang).

Smith echoed the same sentiment, adding that "I'd just like to see if we froze the levy, what would it look like."

She later said she didn't want to disrupt the classroom or the programs, she was attempting to see if administrators could sharpen their pencils and find other ways to trim the overall costs of operations. She took the moment to add that she felt the existing pension system is too generous.  

The problems that come from failure to levy to the fullest is complicated, said Sass. Noting that the school district is already carrying a $2.6 million deficit, if the district opts not to increase the levy, it loses out on additional revenues due to commercial growth as well. Without an increase, the district's deficit would rise to "$4.1 million."

The deficit increase along with the ongoing cuts in state funding makes an increase in the tax levy even more imperative, he said. If the levy were not increased, the district stands to lose $794,000 for 2012-2013 and another $1.588 million in 2013-2014, according to Sass. "We have the leanest district office than anyone you'll find."

In a later interview with Patch, Board President Nick DiSandro, who voted "yes" to the estimated levy, said, "No one up there is in favor of upping the taxes. But we've already got this large deficit, and we're left with very little choice.

These kinds of public discussion, said DiSandro, are ultimately healthy.

Huang noted that NLSD211 is not alone in this financially difficult situation. While each district has its own unique circumstances, the slicing the state makes in pay out to school districts is wreaking havoc on school district budgets statewide.

On Dec. 6, the NLSD Board of Education is scheduled for an intense financial workshop, the actual tax levy is expected to e adopted at the regular board meeting on Dec. 19.

Two Ways to Stay Connected to New Lenox Patch:

Related Topics: Estimated Tax levy, New Lenox School District 122, New Lenox School District 122 Board of Education, School Budgets, and Tax Levy

Jim

8:42 am on Friday, November 30, 2012

More tax increases.....When is going to end? City, state, tolls, lic fees, utilities, schools... unreal!

Reply

Jaime Wall

1:46 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012

I've lived in New Lenox for more than 30 years. I think it's time to leave for Indiana or practically any other state. My taxes are increasing well beyond my ability to keep up. I've given up hope that one day our elected officials would protect us from overwhelming taxation. I cannot believe that there is never any other alternative to raising taxes. Maybe consider cutting expenses somewhere, maybe consider that we can't afford to have "cadillac" school facilities that have every bell and whistle - offering the best of everything. The concept that I'll have to leave my home of many years because I can no longer afford the tax burden is hard to swallow.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bill Lazara

5:23 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012

Well said Jaime Wall, considering Indiana as well.

Comment_arrow

Mark P

5:56 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012

But won't you miss the new Police Station and the taxes that will come to finance that not needed building?

Comment_arrow

Mrs. Featherbottom

12:26 am on Saturday, December 1, 2012

You'll also miss the library that's never open. Seriously, where's all the money going?

Comment_arrow

al martineck sr

10:08 am on Friday, December 7, 2012

You are 100% right i have grand children in this district so i have to protect them
but im at retirment age and i cannot afford this school districts taxs. i have homes
in other states and believe me this ill is out of site compared to the others....
its time changes need to be made at the offical levels. no one pays for my retirment
we should not have to pay for theirs. school reform is a must

Ray

8:21 am on Saturday, December 1, 2012

think about closing one of the schools

Reply

Sunny Meadows

1:33 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012

People move to New Lenox because of the wonderful schools. Well then, pay for it. Raise the fees for attending the wonderful New Lenox Schools. Your 80 year old neighbors should NOT be paying for our children's education. Also, I have much respect for the thankless jobs the Administrator's and Principal's have, but... 6 figure incomes are ridiculous when the uncertified personnel make less and less money and keep getting less hours. If it wasn't for these employees the kingdom of District 122 would crumble. Raise the student fees and leave the residents of New Lenox alone, they are not to blame for the short comings of the budget.

Reply

Marie

8:53 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2012

The residents are to blame because they voted for this school board. Outsource Huang. We don't need a PR person. One supt. only! Reduce compensation packages ALOT. Huang doesn't care about the taxpayers and either does Sass or the school board members. Close a school. There no differentiating between the state and the community because we are all paying too much. This administration and school board look think of you all as fools, you know. We are their employers-do not forget that. Stop voting for incompetents.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mrs. Featherbottom

10:55 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012

When was the last time you were in Central during class change? I graduated in '04 and let me tell you, we needed another school. We had no room in the hallways for all the kids and no room to expand onto the school.

What a joke

9:29 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012

Tonight I watched the District 122 meeting on TV. I wanted to watch it because this article was a bit unclear. What I witnessed was a full blown joke. I Have never seen a school board so afraid to communicate their feelings openly. To be made a fool, shot down and ridiculed by the Superintendent was a joke. I really wish they had a link for people to sit down and watch the meeting. Your mind will be made up for the upcoming election real quick.

Reply

Nikki Sanders

8:47 am on Friday, December 7, 2012

A public apology is is order from Mike Sass to the members of the School Board he publicly attacked for asking questions and not conforming to his opinion. He needs
to remember they are the elected representatives of his employers, the taxpayers.
Also, lets ask Harold to recalculate that estimated $45/household increase in the proposed levy. There is a significant overall reduction in the TOTAL EAV of the district, and this will significantly increase this number. Be honest with us, folks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Marie

6:16 pm on Friday, December 7, 2012

Absolutely right, Nikki. But I wouldn't rely on the government body which is imposing the tax levy to be completely forthcoming about how their requested tax levy will impact the taxpayers. I think some answers are needed before the Dec 19 meeting.

And on the temperament of the administration: probably one of the reasons why the public does not get as involved as it should with their school district, but the school board members should speak up for us and not cower.

Leave a comment