patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Heading into the April Election: Allegations of Wrong Doing Run High on NLSD122 Board (UPDATE)

Kathy Miller, D122 board member, lost her place on the April ballot.

 

Since the ouster of New Lenox School District 122 member Kathy Miller from the ballot on Jan. 11, allegations of personal and political attacks among board members have bubbled to the top. There's a steamy history between board members that dates back almost four years.

The latest point of contention was the 2-1 vote to invalidate Miller's nominating petition, the three members of the Electoral Board of New Lenox School District 122 declared Miller's potion to be invalid due to a notary error. Broderick, who has been a notary public for 20 years, insisted that her vote was not personally or politically motivated. With a copy of the Illinois Board of Education guidelines and notary association paperwork that specifies the rules for nomination petitions and the notary seal; she said it was a matter of an "insufficient" petition.

The three members that sat on the Electoral Board were president Nick DiSandro, secretary Maureen Broderick and vice president Sue Smith. After a 15-minute recess, DiSandro cast the only vote in favor of Miller. Smith and Broderick voted to reject Miller's petition. (Patch previously described the recess as a closed-door discussion. We regret the error.)

Smith said she voted to strike the page because "it was not in compliance with the election laws."

However, the conflict especially between Broderick, who is secretary of the board, and Miller came to a fever pitch two years ago. At that time, the board authorized a move to put its deposits in Old Plank Trail Bank; Broderick had abstained from the vote. A few weeks later at the Jan. 20, 2011 meeting, Miller accused Broderick of a lack of transparency for not revealing publicly that she worked for a subsidiary of an Old Plank Trail Bank holding company, Wintrust Mortgage Co.  

Miller accused Broderick of violating numerous codes of ethics and policies. "There's legal and then there's ethical," Miller said.

The allegation of a conflict of interest wound up costing the district about "$7,000" worth of attorney's fees and staff time to conclude that the matter was not illegal, said Broderick on Friday. "It was very upsetting."

The cost of the district's legal investigation into the Wintrust matter actually came in around $3,000. School District Attorney Brian Crowley of Franczek Radelet P.C spent between 10 and 12 hours on the matter. His rate is $250 an hour.

On the Wintrust matter specifically, Miller said, "I didn't want an attorney." She thought the matter could be handled at the board level. "(Broderick) was the one that felt that was insufficient."

Broderick pointed out in the minutes of the Jan. 19, 2011 meeting, which can be found on the New Lenox School District 122 website, that Miller referred to the violation as potentially a Class 4 felony. This prompted Broderick to seek input from the district's attorney.

Crowley ultimately found that Broderick had not broken any laws because she abstained from the vote. However, he admonished her and said she should have been more open.

Related stories:

In response, Miller told Broderick, "OK, you didn't do anything illegal. …Just because it's legal doesn't mean we've done our jobs as board members."

However, during the last campaign, Broderick said she has speculated that Miller was behind a plan to discredit her. It was a tight election, and 12 candidates ran for four seats. When questioned about her role in negative campaign tactics, Miller denied any involvement. Instead, Miller said, she suspects Broderick was the real source of that distribution. 

Election 2013

In light of the Jan. 11 vote in favor of removing Miller from the ballot, Miller has accused Broderick of practicing partisan politics.

Miller said she intends to file an appeal of the decision with the Will County Circuit Court.

Miller points out that the person who filed an objection to her petition, Nikki Sanders, is highly active in the local Republican caucus. When asked what compelled Sanders to file and objection to Miller's petition, she said, "A little birdie" provided an anonymous tip."

Miller said the school board is supposed to be "non-partisan. I don't think it's how (Broderick or Smith) have looked at it."

Broderick said she and Miller have known each other since high school. There was no bad blood in their youth, but there has been contention between the two on the board. Still, she said, there haven't been any issues since the gnashing of teeth two years ago.

Speaking of Broderick and Smith, Miller said, "I truly think this is their opportunity to get me off the board."

Two ways to stay connected:

Related Topics: Ballot, Election 2013, Elections 2013 in New Lenox, Kathy Miller, New Lenox School District 122 Board of Education, Notary Public, Sue Smith, and maureen broderick

Kimberly

8:30 am on Monday, January 14, 2013

Thank you very much for the follow up article. I appreciate knowing all/more of the facts and its been very eye opening, to say the least.

Reply

Mildred Frackenbottom

9:32 am on Monday, January 14, 2013

" Eww. Cat fight. " * grabbing popcorn *

Reply

Amy

9:36 am on Monday, January 14, 2013

Maybe we should handle this the way a parent/teacher would. Take them both out of the situation since they can't seem to play nice with each other. I, personally, would rather not see this kind of behavior on any Board, let alone a Board of Education. This should be about the children, and not about who doesn't like who.

Reply

Ed

2:45 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

If the election forms do not have to be filled out correctly, then we shouldn't have laws or restrictions regarding the forms. It appears the forms DO need to be filled out correctly, and this one was not, so it was was deemed invalid. There is an appeal process and Miller plans to go down that path. End of story. If you are bored and want to read about a cat fight, go reread the articles about what happened with Gilhooley.

Reply

Cat

6:46 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

I for one do NOT appreciate paying $8,000 a year in taxes, most of which goes to our schools, and seeing this ongoing immature behavior regarding school board members. The Gilluliy thing was sordid and embarrassing. Now this nonsense and infighting. I say it's time to clean house of all of them as they are all highly unprofessional and obviously unethical people. They are spending our hard earned money citizens of new Lenox. Get rid of all of the babies and get some professionals for once.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Will County Resident

11:33 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

I'm confused what you want then. Do you want "professionals" that can't be bothered to get more than 6 extra signatures when they know a sheet can be contested for being filled out incorrectly? Do you want a "professional" in office that can't even fill out a simple election ballot form, but will then be put in charge of the budget?

Or do you want professionals that stick to what the rules are and abides them? Please, tell me exactly what you want regarding this decision. Should Kathy accept that she needs to pay attention to her forms if she's only going to get 56 signatures for an position that requires 50 VALID, or should the current board members have let her go through, despite the clear invalidity of obtaining signatures through one person and signing them as another?

Will County Resident

3:50 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

This article used to say "Miller, who is active in the local Democratic Party", but it does not anymore.

http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/1609/screenshotxjb.png

What was the reason for this change? Is Kathy Miller not actually active in the local democrats, or is she active and asked for it to be removed, or she is active and it was the editor's decision to remove that portion of the article?

Reply

Carrie M.

10:38 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

This is good. Rules are to be followed.
And . . . What goes around, comes around, Kathy.

Reply

Amanda Bowl

10:38 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

I hope this isn't Democrats against Republicans, because it shouldn't be. Don't know what party Broderick supports, but she is definately power hungry.

Reply

Amy

10:38 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

This school board is beyond crazy. While I understand what has happened on this particular case, the stories that have preceded this, coupled with childish behavior demonstrated here have convinced me that a role on the school board is not on my future. Who in the world wants to walk into that snake den and attempt to keep things moving in a positive direction? The whole board needs to be cleaned out.

Reply

Leave a comment