Teary-Eyed Ex-Tinley Cop Gets Probation for DUI Hit and Run
At his sentencing hearing, John Leonard apologized for having struck another car in Frankfort last year and sped off. The judge sentenced Leonard to the minimum punishment, which includes classes and counseling.
John Leonard held back the tears as long as he could. After apologizing on Friday to all the people he hurt as a result of a drunken hit-and-run accident last May, the former Tinley Park cop sat down and awaited the court’s mercy.
He was sentenced to 30 months of probation on felony charges that could have locked him up for seven years.
Leonard, 38, was driving an unmarked police car with an open glass of Guinness and a handgun between his legs on May 1, 2011, around 1 a.m., when he rear-ended another car at LaGrange Road and Lincolnway Lane in Frankfort and sped off.
He was later stopped in New Lenox and reportedly taunted local police officers, saying, “So what?” in reference to the pistol in plain view, “I’m a Tinley cop.”
He entered into a blind plea deal last month for charges of driving under the influence, leaving the scene of an accident and failure to report an accident involving personal injury.
Although Judge Edward Burmila, Jr., called Leonard’s actions “unsettling, almost reprehensible” for having “dishonored himself and (police) officers generally,” he found the maximum penalty too severe in light of “the totality of facts.”
Leonard has no criminal background, the judge pointed out, and a court-ordered evaluation determined that his abuse of alcohol was a direct cause of the crash. DUI victim-impact courses and substance abuse counseling are a part of his probation, Burmila said.
Michael Murphy of Chicago, one of the men in the car Leonard struck, who walked stiffly and slowly to the witness stand, said he cannot stand now for more than 10 minutes at a time without spasms in his back and spine. As he was strapped and carried off by paramedics, he said, he managed to tell police officers with his eyes which way Leonard’s car had gone.
“This man, John Leonard, left us for dead,” Murphy said. "He had no regard for human life. As a result of his actions, I will have to go through (physical) therapy for the rest of my life.”
He said he has a separate civil lawsuit in the works against Leonard and the Village of Tinley Park.
Leonard is “not a perfect person,” his attorney, Steven Haney, said, but he had been an “exemplary police officer” for 13 years prior. Haney said his client is in the midst of bankruptcy proceedings and has been unable to find work since his arrest.
“On that night, I failed not only myself but my family and my community,” Leonard said, fighting a lump in his throat.
If Leonard completes probation without any violations, Haney said after the hearing, the felony charges are eligible to be vacated from his record.
scott trodden
12:48 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
if he wasn't a cop, he would be in jail!!!!!!
Glenn Ciupazecka
11:21 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
30 months? that is it???
Kevin
12:52 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
Bad bad call judge!!! He was a cop! Plus, his felony charges could be removed from his record after probation? What the heck.
Jesse Marx
2:54 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
According to his attorney, yes. The judge sentenced Leonard to what is technically known as TASC (treatment alternatives for safe communities) probation: http://www.tasc.org/preview/index.html
Glenn Ciupazecka
11:26 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
Really??? So does he get to keep his driver licence after all this shit?
DUI's is nothing for Police, is only 4-6 hours of paperwork. But for this guy named John Leonard "So What? I'm a Tinley Cop!" TASC isn't good enough... I want him to go to M.A.D.D. and do at least one year in IDOC. So, for him to suffer! But for his family to feel the pain as well!
MMF
12:53 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
Absolutely ridiculous. If it was a civilian they would of had the book thrown at them and been made a public example. A minimum sentence for permanently injuring someone is appauling.
Mary
1:22 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
Felony charges should stick... even a DUI follows you all your life now...he'll probably be a repeat offender after this slap on the wrist.. shameful sentencing... he probably thought he'd get away with it by fleeing and it looks like he has in a sense. I hope I'm not the next person he leaves for dead. Prayers go out to the victims.
D Greg
1:44 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
Probation and classes seem like an extremely light sentence for a felony. The parents of the party in the other story got a misdemeanor charge and received a stronger sentence. Guess it's all 'who ya know.'
Russ
2:13 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
This is not just a guy that got arrested and convicted for his first DUI,but he is a drunken (convicted DUI) police officer that struck another car and left the scene of the accident disregarding the condition of the victims. Also, putting his fellow officers at risk that pursued him and he gets probation.WHAT????? I guess boo hoo works for cops,not so much for the victims.
Is this an electable judge?If so, he needs to be removed.
SR
2:33 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
Are any of you people here free of sin? What skeletons do you have in your closet? You have no right to make such comments (cast stones), because no person is sinless. And to assume that he would be a repeat offender? How would you like people to "assume" things of you?
Also, I recall hearing stories of how it took second and third offenses before someone finally got jail time. So to give non-cops probation and give jail time to a cop is a disparity in justice.
Kevin
3:33 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
SR, a buddy of the guy? None of us non-cops would have received this light of a sentence and the possibility of having the felony removed off our record. Really? I guess we should wait until next time when a victim dies. A cop leaving the scene. really? You're going to defend this guy?
Rory Hughes
7:02 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
To call someone out just for having their own opinion is throwing your own stone. Sorry you don't like the fact that many are not a fan of Leonard. It is just the way it is.
dash
6:56 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012
Nicely put. I like your opinion. It's true. No one reading this story knows anything about Leonard and his personal life yet they all sit here and judge him. Everyone makes mistakes, just not everyone gets caught. Here is a horrible mistake made by someone who should have known better, but then again, i think that we have all been in a situation where we "should have known better".
af75
4:03 pm on Sunday, April 22, 2012
@ dash - being that Leonard has been in the area for a long time, too assume that know one knows him is to assume a lot.
Robot Jungle
5:22 am on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Actually Kevin, you probably would. First time felony offenders with no background are often given TASC and 4:10 probation with the ability to have charges dismissed upon successful completion. People make mistakes, and this man served a community once called "The Best Place to Raise Your Kids" for 13 years. So yes, I think he does deserve a little break.
Rick
3:03 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
Must be a tinley park thing. My niece Rosie was killed when her husband, John Haberkamp, drove their SUV into a light pole while he was drunk. No charges there either!
dash
6:58 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012
Sorry to hear that. I remember that accident. Actually they ended up charging him later.
Russ
3:08 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
@SR, Social judgement as opposed to religious judgement.Good reason for the separation of church and state.
Sgt. USMC
11:48 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
I agree completely. Nobody is without sin, but that is not the question. He disobeyed social laws, and he must answer to society.
Tim
3:27 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
Jail or not, this has forever changed what I think of the Leonard's. I think you know what I mean, changed forever not for the better. I would be walking with my head down if I were John. Jerk.
Tim
4:04 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
@SR, I don't think that people are claiming to be without their own sins. This case generated special awareness because not only was Leonard a cop, he expected other cops, his peers, to stoop to his low level once caught. When they did not cooperate with Leonard's sense of entitlement, he went off on them, lied to them and also left injured victim's behind. I also think that all cops should not be viewed as Leonard just because they have the same career he just threw away. Somebody has enabled this man. Somebody, friends, maybe family have led John to believe this was ok behavior. This does not happen overnight. Cop or not, John acted like a real scum bag and this act will not be forgotten.
CurtH
4:31 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
@SR, instead of taking the time to defend Leonard, why don't you take a few minutes to share your thoughts about what Mr. Murphy has been through, what he is now suffering from and how it impacts him and how you would feel if you were in Mr. Murphy's shoes???!!! How would you feel if you yourself were hit by John Leonard and permanently injured? Next time someone steps on your toes, injures or insults you, keep this in mind before you say anything or think anything of them - thank you.
mr joe
5:47 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
i bet that most of the persons on this forum have driven drunk sometime in their lives-smoked some weed- cheated on their wifes or girlfrieds - shop lifited at a store- drove 85 miles a hour in a 45 mph speed zone- etc. most of you need to look in the mirror and take a good look at yourselves.
Kevin
6:08 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
I see you don't get it, too bad. Any mistakes I have made in my life, I have owned up to them. I did not try to run away from them, try to have my fellow workers and peers cover up what I did and try to lie my way out of it. Using the word "most" tells me you are probably pretty young. Sorry, most people don't do those things.
fromthestreet
7:41 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
@ mr.joe, ... well, this tells us about the company you keep.
Jack in the City
6:20 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
Thank you Kevin. Yes, most people do not do these things. Well, they don't threaten to sexually assault another cop for not letting them go from and lie about car damage they caused while also having a dumped out glass of Guinness beer in their car. Also, if some people don't realize that when they condemn people for supposedly casting stones against another, they are casting their own stone. Above all, Mr. Leonard was a cop. Someone who not only should have known better but was trained and paid to know better.
Beverly Prince Moss
6:45 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
Now what friends he has left will get to hear him whine and bitch about having to go to his victim impact classes! Every time the poor guy looks at a bottle of Guiness he will be reminded that he didn't get away!
What about Mr. Murphy? Who is going to do all the tasks that he is now left unable to do? This guy should have to pay for services!
Rory Hughes
6:58 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
While Leonard has escaped jail time, he and his family will never fully escape this incident and the impression it has left. That is probably the worst punishment. Heck, if he went to jail, people could say he served his time. What can they say now?
4th wright
6:38 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012
To those who are convinced a civilian would get jail time in similar circumstances, I can tell you this is not true. I was a police officer for over 35 years, and I arrested several people in very similar circumstances. They did not get jail time. People usually only get jail time for repeat offenses. I'm not defending what happened here. Leonard has to live with this, and that will not be easy for him or his family.
Baba Wawa
8:52 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Absolutley true, 4th wright. He got an appropriate sentence. He has no criminal background. He's eligible for probation. Thousands of people get probation on their first DUI. It happens every day. Everyone needs to stop foaming at the mouth just because he was a cop he got off easy.
Kevin
7:56 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012
And many do get jail time. I'm not saying he deserved the max, but getting the minimum sentence is what I think many on here have a problem with. C'mon, it's bad enough with the DUI and the victim having permanent injuries, but let's add hit and run and the other BS stuff concerning Leonard and his then fellow police officers. The icing on the cake is that he was a police officer, paid to protect and serve. Let's not even get started with the possibility in having the felony removed from his record. Thank you for serving as a police officer for so long. I don't know when you retired, but we are suppose to be in an age of being much tougher against drunk drivers.
Baba Wawa
8:54 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Felonies don't get removed from your record; he was sentenced on a misdemeanor. The State most likely nolle pros'd any felony charges.
Kevin
8:59 am on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Baba Wawa, It's a little more then just a DUI!
As for the felony being removed, his lawyer would disagree with you.
Dave W.
12:22 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
ALL of the punishments for DUI are ENTIRELY too light in this state. I have a relative in a LARGE police force, for over 3o years...he has had the 'battle of the bottle' himself...YET, he told me that a big reason why the laws are so slack on DUI type cases is that "Lots of cops drink, lots of them drink too much, and they both know how it is, AND feel like hypocrites for busting people too hard for it. Better to give them a seatbelt ticket and tell them to be careful or have them even call to get a ride. Judges hate putting cops in jail, so unless they kill somebody with witnesses and on purpose, you never see cops go to jail."
Now, I don't KNOW this to be true firsthand, but he told me this with seven or eight of his cop-buddies, all nodding in agreement or saying 'Yep" or something similar.
Having said THAT, I was run down ON purpose by a drunk Cubs fans on opening day a couple of years ago. The OLPD did a great job, got the guy a few blocks away...perfect. He was charged with Aggravated Manslaughter, a felony. He could have gotten seven years, but had no record and was sentenced to three. I got a letter that he was due to be released early. After ten months for trying to KILL somebody, he was out. Because it was criminal, his insurance didn't cover anything.
So, do cops get special treament? It CERTAINLY seems so. DO 'regular' criminals get off too lightly in these cases? It CERTAINLY seems so.
You don't get drunk on accident. Everyting else after that is on you.
SR
1:27 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
People commenting on here need to learn about forgiveness and need find something better to do than make nasty comments about John. I am sure if he could go back in time and do things differently, he would have. The weight and burden he has to carry for this for the rest of his life is punishment enough. Leave the man alone and focus on your own life.
Dave W.
1:42 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
SR, this is a PUBLIC comments section. If any of us wanted to focus on our own lives, we would be planting a garden, or saving a whale, or cleaning a gun in the basement or our mom's house or doing something, anything, more constructive, so don't be silly with that.
This is NOT a case of 'The weight and burden he has to carry for this for the rest of his life is punishment enough.' Sorry. Just not true. He betrayed a puclic trust, he broke the laws that govern our society. Those laws are what make us a civilization, not petty warring tribes or nomads without thought. He made a bad decision, then he more more after that. He flaunted his being an officer to the cops that stopped him, meaning he was EXPECTING to get away with his behavior. THAT isn't contrition. THAT isn't being sorry. THAT is hubris and arrogance.
To let him off with such a little sentence is to virtual reward him for his vile, criminal behavior. People could have DIED, SR! If that had happened, had it been YOUR relative, I find it hard to believe you would be so forgiving. Nobody DID die, which is great, so the sentence can't reflect what MIGHT have happened. IT certainly COULD reflect what DID happen, and just how serious THAT is.
Will New Lenox
4:13 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
If Mr. Murphy were never hit, never hurt, and left on the road, people might be more inclined to leave Mr. Leonard alone. I see you have a couple of comments here and not one directed towards the man injured. Your not helping Mr. Leonard by defending him, you are only supporting those who believe he is arrogant and enabled.
af75
4:06 pm on Sunday, April 22, 2012
@SR - The night of the scene it appears that John was dishing out a lot of nasty comments himself to his peers. The story states he is 38 years old. Old enough to know what he is saying even when drunk - especially once arrested. Is only John allowed to have an opinion of a situation?
Chi Town 1
2:05 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Sorry SR, the real attitudes of Leonard have been exposed. That is something Leonard and family can no longer hide from the public. John held a sense of entitlement to the point that he expected to be let go. As if the officers and society owed it to him and his family. Now the Village of Tinley Park is using public funds to pay their legal fees for the suit Mr. Murphy has filed against them. Therefore, the public has a right to state their comments on this public forum. Amazing, you want everyone to just immediately forgive John on his comments of "So What?", personal injury he caused, expenses incurred etc. but you want to slap the hands of others for making comment on this situation. Amazing. Just amazing. Well, you must be someone who helped build this man's sense of entitlement.
Will New Lenox
4:09 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
This whole situation is disturbing. Could have been avoided had Leonard just not been so arrogant. This is more than a cop or average citizen pulled over for a DUI. No 38 old drinks and still has the ability to drive and then goes off on a rant like he did without knowing what they are doing or saying and who they are saying it to. God Bless Mr. Murphy. I hopes he fully recovers and hope Mr. Leonard has to pay for all his services.
fromthestreet
6:00 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
... Judge Edward Burmila, Jr., called Leonard’s actions “unsettling, almost reprehensible” for having “dishonored himself and (police) officers generally,” he found the maximum penalty too severe in light of “the totality of facts.”
"almost reprehensible” ... really, what does a cop have to do... for his actions to be deem reprehensible ?
Leonard has no criminal background, the judge pointed out...
Yes, no criminal background... that wouldn't be because he is a cop, and is above the Law, now would it ?!
So, when Leonard completes probation without any violations, and the felony charges are vacated from his record, will he be allowed to pursue a law enforcement position in a different city or state ?
Sgt. USMC
12:07 am on Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Yes but the judge cannot assume that there was a criminal history just because he was a cop and could have gotten away with it. The judge had the information that was present, and made and decision. Would you like to be judge based on "what probably happened"? The judge is not to blame. The cop who hurt people and failed to protect and serve is to blame.
not judging anyone
6:10 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Need to look at several things here. 1st and foremost Mr. Leonard messed up. I think he got what he deserved. I work in a courthouse and can tell you that most people with no criminal history get probation. Its just a fact. Cop or no cop. Second, if this man was not a cop this would not even be news. Nobody would be talking about it. Third, if this man was not a cop, he would still have his job. If he was a garbage man, electrician, plumber etc. his union would have paid for his lawyer and he would have kept his job. I for one am glad he lost his job. He deserved that because you people are right he should have known better. But with that said shouldn't every adult know better? Lastly, I remember reading that Mr. Murphy had just had back surgery a week prior to the accident. So do we really know the extent of how much damgage this cop caused? I am sure it did not help but he already had severe back issues. Let's hope Mr. Murphy gets better and lets hope Mr. Leonard has learned a lession and never does it again. I don't know either man I also don't know the whole story. Unless you know either guy you people are listening to the media and I know from working in a courthouse how much they mess up the truth!
Sgt. USMC
12:09 am on Tuesday, April 24, 2012
You said it straight!
fromthestreet
6:14 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Shouldn't the people (Police, Judges, Teachers Mayors etc.) who asked to be placed in a position of public trust and where given that opportunity to serve the Public, be held to a higher standard ?
If they don't uphold the laws, rules and regulations, how can you punish the regular citizen who errs so severely ?
Matthew
6:33 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
As an retired police officer it saddens me to see how most people resent and wish the worst for police officers when they screw up. In my 20+ years of service I arrested approx. 100 DUI drivers but also gave dozens breaks. And a great majority of the breaks I gave were to normal average citizens who were given rides home or picked up by a family member. And of the 100+ arrests, maybe 5 received jail time. The 95 or so that got probation were mostly do to them being first time offenders and not causing a fatality. I agree that cops need to be held to a higher standard because of the oath they take but I do not believe they should be punished in extreme just because they are cops. The punishment he received may not satisfy the bloodlust in this room but he has already paid a price. He lost his career which a great majority of DUI offenders don't have happen. From what I read it appears his financial situation is in ruins as well. I'm sure he's paying the price as well with his marital relationship. I feel sorry for the injured victim but what good would it serve to jail a non violent ex-cop and father of two young daughters. For everyone who thinks they know what goes on in courtrooms but have never been, I encourage you to sit in on some misdemeanor and felony hearings at the Joliet courthouse. You'll be surprised to see what really goes on. Ok ,let the fireworks begin.
Kevin
9:47 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Defend the police brotherhood.
Yeah, maybe 5% of DUI's get probation, but let's add the hit and run, the way he acted to the arresting cops. This is not your everyday run of the mill DUI. SOmeone could have gotten killed, but because thankfully no one did, then just give this guy the minimum sentence. I'm tired of seeing first hand many cops with their arrogant above the law attitude. (not saying you're one of them Matt)
MIKE JONES
9:18 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012
Kevin,
Where do you get your statistical information?
Dave W.
8:22 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Everybody raise your hand if you are SHOCKED that an officer would stand up for another officer. Sorry Matthew, not to outright dismiss your service or the things you saw and did, but I also DO know personally both what relatives who ARE police (and his cop-friends) told me, AND I know how lightly DUI is taken in general in this state (since I can't speak to other states).
Just for conversation-sake, I'll give you the possiblity he DIDN'T get special treatment. He didn't get enough time, even if he WAS a 'regular' citizen. He could have KILLED people. Why do drunks and their defenders always overlook this fact. People who drive drunk rarely do it once. If you want to play Russian Roulette with YOUR life, and those of YOUR loved ones, you feel free to magically zap all the drunk drivers and yourself and those who want to keep cutting criminals (BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE) a 'break' because THEY have suffered enough, to a secluded land. They don't deserve a 'hardship license' because we all know they abuse that all the time. They deserve a sentence. We keep being told driving is not a right, but a privledge (the argument from law enforcement of why it is constitutional to make seatbelts on adult drivers mandatory, for example). So, I can get a ticket for my seatbelt, which harms NOBODY but me, but vehicular manslaughter, KILLING somebody is five years? Why? Because tickets are revenue, prison costs the state money. I'll bet the man he hit felt he was hit violently, though.
Kevin
9:43 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Hand raised. And I know quite a few police officers also and the sense of entitlement they expect.
fromthestreet
1:22 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012
Another hand up here !
MIKE JONES
9:17 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012
Your sarcastic remark is well thought out, except this guy was arrested. By who??? Oh yeah, the Police. Who do you think arrested him? Other Police Officers did. Who put in their report his comments? Other Police Officers did. Every walk of life has people who feel entitled, bankers, lawyers, truck drivers you name it, we have it.
Matthew
9:29 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Dave, Don't mistake my saying that he should be treated fairly, which it appears he was, as saying I support DUI drivers. I've seen first hand the devastation drunk drivers cause, far two many times. Having to give parents notice that their 18 daughter was killed in a accident, caused by a drunk driver, is one such incident that is burned in my memory for the rest of my life. Personally I don't consume alcolic beverages except at special occasions and then only in moderation. I am for harsh punishment for DUI drivers as long as it is dished out equally. If the standard is 1 years in jail for a first time offender, then that's fine as long as everyone get that. The problem I have is that everyone here thinks cops get breaks in court but it's usually just the opposite due to the pressure and media attention. There are 1000's of DUI arrests across Cook and Will County each month but we only hear about the ones involving tragic fatalities or the ones involving cops. And most of the fatality ones never get media attention again but the ones involving cops get reprinted over and over. I'm not saying Leonard doesn't deserve to be punished, cause he does, but only in accordance with general practice.
Matthew
9:30 pm on Saturday, April 21, 2012
Personally I was embarrassed by his actions and statements upon being stopped and arrested. That is one thing i hated the most when arresting people. That alone deserves a couple nights in county jail. I wish I had a dollar for every drunk that MF'ed and threatened me while intoxicated only to sober up and be a decent human being. Obviously they are a-holes when their inhibitions are removed..
Stenven Lindner
1:21 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012
Funny how the cops on this board are so lenient with the entitled drunk. I most certainly do not want someone who has such intimate first-hand knowledge of laws and consequences flouting them in my face and endangering my family.
Judiciary is lock-step with the po-lice. There should at least be a facade of justice here. Did this misfit get a Blow-n-Go interlock on his car? Why not, your Honor?
AGGRAVATED DUI - You know- when you are too drunk to give a hoot that you just smashed into another car and keep 'on drinkin' an drivin'? Playing with his service revolver while drunk? Oh, yeah- he's a trained professional. Even tried to use his official position as a cop to shirk his civic responsibilities. But this is the Republik of Illinois. Vomit.
No, he most certainly wasn't punished like joe citizen would have been. Run through the system.
j 74
8:01 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012
A comment was made here that most probably don't know Mr. Murphy or Leonard. True. I don't know Mr. Murphy but know Mr. Leonard from town and school. Worst person in the world -no. Head too big for his shoulders - definitely. Now after this incident, I am disgusted and disappointed to know how far the ego was out of control.
Tina
8:12 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012
He'll do it again they always do!
MIKE JONES
9:09 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012
If you look at statistics in Cook County, the punishment fit the crime. This man had no previous record. The court buildings are filled with DUI offenders the overwhelming majority of whom receive no jail time. In Cook County. I would venture to guess nearly everyone on this board knows a person or two who has a DUI in their past and has not done jail time.
Kevin
9:24 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012
It's not just a DUI and the statistics won't break it down into was it just DUI, was it hit and run also. etc... Look at everything that happened in this situation. Why should he get the felony removed from his record? That would not happen to you or me.
The problem is that he received the minimum sentence and he is a cop. To the normal civilian it just looks like another cop getting a free ride after braking another law. Sorry, cops break many laws, I see it everyday.
Joann Cyborski
11:01 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012
Everyone breaks laws every day! NO ONE can tell me that they don't go at least 1mph over the speed limit or drive behind someone at the legal distance or even put their turn signals on EVERY time the change lanes or turn. AND just so everyone is properly informed.... cops are human just like you and me.
MIKE JONES
11:15 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012
I am looking at what happened in this situation (mostly you have to feel bad for Mr. Murphy), the gravity of this situation is not lost on me. I am looking at it from an outsiders prospective. Mr. Leonard is on Probation. If he completes it he is Eligible for the felony being removed from his record. On a daily basis the States Attorneys office uses this. As for it happening to me or you, If you or I plead we would also be eligible for this possibility. I don't believe this is the minimum sentence, not saying he deserved less or more, I just don't believe this is the minimum.
What laws do you see cops breaking every day?
Joann Cyborski
10:53 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012
I am disappointed in the Village of Tinley Park and the Tinley Park Police Department for kicking Mr. Leonard to the curb. Yes what Mr. Leonard did was wrong, but he has an addiction problem by the looks of it. All I can say is SHAME ON YOU Tinley Park Police Department and the Village of Tinley park for not supporting him. As one of the highest statistically rated professions to become alcoholics I would think that there was something in place to help employees overcome this. Instead, Mr. Leonard is unemployed, filing bankruptcy and has a long haul ahead of him to rectify this error in judgement. The sentence the judge meted out to him was typical for his case whether any of you that are out for his "lynching" know this or not. If you choose to comment about my own OPINION in this.....go ahead. But don't slam me because I have a different opinion than you. If this was your husband/brother/son/father you all would be the first one to yell at his employers for not offering him help!
All I can say is SHAME ON YOU Tinley Park Police Department and the Village of Tinley Park!
The Guru
11:39 am on Sunday, April 22, 2012
Joann, Of all people that should know better it should be a police officer. I respect the officers on the streets taking care of things that nobody wants to take care of. But i am positive that he knew the dangers of Drunk Driving before hand, I would venture to guess that he has locked up at least a few people for DUI. We hold certain people to a higher standard because they are professionals. Im not saying that officers should never make errors in judgement. But this was not an error in judgement, it was negligence. The Police Department and the village did what they needed. His judgement has shown to be poor, and he should not be allowed to be a police officer if he can not follow the law that he is sworn to uphold.
Matthew
1:12 pm on Sunday, April 22, 2012
My opinion on this incident has been previously posted but I disagree with Joann condemning the Tinley P.D. or the Village on this matter. It's one thing to offer a police officer help for a drinking problem but Leonard took it to the next level when he fled the scene. In committing that felony he sealed his fate. If he would have stayed at the scene, attempted to render help and faced the music like a man, he could have possibly saved his job and career. As soon as he made his decision, even though it was impaired, to flee the scene he lost all hope of support from his department and village.
af75
4:00 pm on Sunday, April 22, 2012
I agree. This was more than someone being pulled over for a DUI.
fromthestreet
1:44 am on Monday, April 23, 2012
@ Matthew, you hit the nail on the head !
AJ Lansing
9:05 am on Monday, April 23, 2012
Well said. Sealed his fate upon leaving the scene - cop or not, impaired or not. Even if he was already seeking treatment for a addiction, he still left the scene.
Matthew
1:22 pm on Sunday, April 22, 2012
And for everyone making up their own statistics about how cops get breaks when the average person does not, here are real statistics on DUI's for 2008.
• More than 48,000 people were arrested for DUI in Illinois in 2008 — an average of 130 every day.
• The "Average" Illinois DUI Offender:
-Male (79 percent of DUI arrests)
-Age 34 (more than 60 percent are under age 35)
-Arrested between 11 p.m. and 4 a.m. on a weekend
-Caught driving with a BAC of .16 (twice the legal limit)
-A first-time offender (83 percent have no prior DUI
Conviction)
•The Criminal Charges
— 31 percent resulted in convictions (23 percent of first
offenses and 75 percent of repeat offenses).
— 63 percent received court supervision (probation).
— 6 percent received other dispositions, including
dismissals, acquittals or convictions for lesser charges
such as reckless driving.
Dave W.
9:54 pm on Sunday, April 22, 2012
I just would like to note that if 23 and 75 add up to 98, which they do, because I own a calculator, what about the other 2% of offenses that AREN'T first time or repeat? What could THAT be called? Just curious.
Kevin
9:56 am on Monday, April 23, 2012
Just keep ignoring that he fled the scene! Amazing!
Matthew
1:23 pm on Sunday, April 22, 2012
•Other Notable DUI Stats
-12,000 — Annual deaths attributed to drunk driving
nationwide
-400 — Fatal alcohol-related crashes in Illinois each
year
-1.4 million — Drunk driving arrests in the U.S. each
year
-50 to 75 percent — Estimated people who continue
driving while suspended for DUI
-64 percent — Estimated reduction in repeat DUIs from
ignition interlock laws
-65 percent — Americans who support ignition interlock
-87 percent — Americans who support sobriety
checkpoints
-49,527 — Three-time DUI offenders in Illinois
-5,659 — Five-time DUI offenders in Illinois
-5.6 percent — Motorcyclists who are under the
influence (.08)
-0.3 percent — Minivan drivers who are under the
influence
-$16,000 — Total average cost of a DUI conviction,
according to the Illinois Secretary of State
Dave W.
10:15 pm on Sunday, April 22, 2012
Matthew, I can only speak for what I was told, anecdotally, by the cops I know. WHY they would LIE to me, when it would make them look WORSE, I have NO idea...perhaps you do. I have no other 'stats', though, and yours look quite sound, aside from the odd discrepency I pointed out above...what your stats DO seem to me (maybe ONLY to me) is that, as I mentioned earlier, ALL DUIs get off easy. Look at how many repeat offenders there are, and that is just those that are caught. How many night did they play Russian Roulette with their driving and just get lucky that the street they used had no cars to hit, or people to run over? That the sign they knocked down didn't incapacitate their car where they could drive away? That the cop that DID pull them over DID let them go? These cops did their jobs...maybe because they are just good, upstanding cops (let's hope so...), but maybe they only took him because he was being SUCH a jerk, even to them, and he wasn't an 'in-town officer' that they said' Ya know, this guy is going in'. (I say this last part, because I asked my relative what he thought of this situation, and he immediately said "Oh, that guy must have p***ed those coppers off.") Maybe Matthew, you were such a straightlaced officer, that people who were a little 'not-so-much' shied away from you. I mean that with no disrespect, just that maybe you never saw it because they feared you would do your job, and NOT turn the blind eye that everybody else seems to know.
MIKE JONES
2:32 pm on Sunday, April 22, 2012
Thanks for the stats Matt. I appreciate your service with the Police Department.
af75
3:59 pm on Sunday, April 22, 2012
@ Matthew - Thank you for all the stats. I agree with you, this whole scene changed when Leonard fled (mistake #2 - mistake #1 is the DUI itself), had dumped open beer in his car along with a gun and box of bullets out in the open (mistake #3), said "So What?...." (mistake #4), Lied about the car damage (mistake #5), told the officers they should be "taking care of him" (mistake #6) and threatened to sexually assault his fellow officers when they did not comply to his requests (mistake #7). It is just disturbing. And ultimately, Leonard is just getting back what he gave unfortunately. You dish it, you have to take it. Sorry "SR", not everyone just forgives so easily just because he is "a Leonard". No one cares about that. As John likes to say "So What?".
@dash - while everyone here may not know Leonard, it is a lot to assume that no one here does not know him from Tinley Park or from school. He has lived in the area for 38 years.
SR
5:25 pm on Sunday, April 22, 2012
People need to realize that not everything the media/news reports is true. Information is often twisted, exargerrated, or left out and then there are plain lies. It is foolish for anyone to believe everything they hear or read.
AJ Lansing
8:35 am on Monday, April 23, 2012
I just heard about this at dinner last night through friends. Went back and read some stories and ok SR, maybe everything is not dead on true. However, something tells me that the leaving the scene (with injured victims) in a village owned vehicle is true. And maybe something he said was was written down exactly the way he said it. But based on the police report and the number of times he spoke, something tells me that he expected to be let go. I can't believe that all those statements over the evening were completely not true. Maybe you know John and are grieving this situation and change of life for this man and his family and I can understand that. Grief also has a denial component too. Keep that in mind. This can't all be wrong. He did plead guilty to it.
Kevin
9:58 am on Monday, April 23, 2012
I'll take the work of a Tinley Park police officer who is a good friend of mine. The story is pretty spot on. Try again sticking up for your brother, friend or fellow police officer.
Russ
8:18 pm on Sunday, April 22, 2012
@Matthew, thank you for your comments, insight, statistics and especially your service. You seem like a knowledgeable and caring police officer, the kind of professional that the public needs for their protection. I understand that a good officer should have some latitude in making arrests, but I can’t help cringe, when you speak of letting DUI offenders off, at times. The statistics that you gave show the gravity of this crime. I would rather see more arrests, convictions and jail time considering the terrible consequences that can be caused by drunken drivers.
Dave W.
10:32 pm on Sunday, April 22, 2012
Exactly my thougth, Russ. DUI isn't a seatbelt or not stopping for five seconds at a stop sign when nobody is around at three iin the morning. People acting like there are no shades of gray between possibly killing innocents and having a taillight out or doing 32 in a 30 are misconstruing the debate in a dangerous way. Seriously, why are people DEFENDING somebody that could have KILLED somebody? HOW is that seem like the right side of the debate to take? EVER?
For Joann Cyborski to say that it is common for cops to be alcoholics...I know: my relative and ALL BUT ONE of the cops I talked to are alcoholics, IN the program. They NEVER arrest each other! They said the MOST they have ever done was pull a guy's keys, but that only happened about five times in over thirty years. THAT was just the guys there that night. What, I stumbled across the ONLY cops that are like this? The ONE magical group? Right.
This guy was a repeat offender (as most DUIs are)...how many times did somebody look the other way? Maybe never, sure...maybe he just NEVER got pulled over, in twenty years of possibly drinking and driving. Especially not after he was a cop and in "...one of the highest statistically rated professions to become alcoholic..." (thanks Joan!). There are a LOT of maybes, but any good cop would tell you that those are too many to not be something more. Cops want to be revered and respected above average citizens; fine. Then the same counts when they do something bad, too.
Russ
11:09 pm on Sunday, April 22, 2012
Great points, Dave. Forty some years ago when I started driving the tolerance for drunken drivers was higher and thought to actually be funny when it occurred.Over the years laws have become stricter and awareness of drunken driver disasters have heightened.I am dismayed when reading the accounts from Patch and other news sources about the continuing dui problems in our area, considering all the supposed awareness about the hazards of drunk driving. If you put together all the comments and experiences of police arrests, non arrests, coverups, light court sentencing, apathy for the victims, people that side with dui drivers, it might explain the high frequency of duis.
Dave W.
11:25 pm on Sunday, April 22, 2012
From what I know (and I'm not omnipotent in any regard, but I do have experience with this unfortunately), it is systemic. Lenient police, lenient courts, repeat offenders, victims made out of criminals.
I wonder, for people like Joan...if this was a crackhead that broke into her home only to steal enough for more crack...but CLEARLY an addict, would that be okay? Realistically, there would be a far lesser chance of people ending up hurt or dead, with only some stolen personal property...is one drug better than another? Should THAT criminal get off easy too? Addiction is ahrd, terrible thing. Yet to label everyone with a problem; is that a set up, for our own possible defense? Because we all have SOMETHING, right? How many people used THAT inane defense? All the kids drank (no they didn't). ALL drivers break laws (yes, doing a mile over is EXACTLY the same as doing fifty over, or being drunk, or leaving the scene of an accident, etc...). All people are treated equal, cops NEVER get away with anything...(Um, no.) I don't want the cops to be put in front of a firing squad, I just want the law to be applied equally to everyone. It won't be, ever, I know. I can dream, though.
The thing about cops getting arrested, or not...there is NO paper trail of cops (or anyone else) being let go. Nobody fills out a form that reports how many stops DON'T result in DUI (or anything else). So the statistics can only tell us what is reported. The great unknown is the UNreported.
Kevin
12:02 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
I'll never forget a few years ago some friends and I were leaving a Blackhawks game. We were all very drunk, including a local suburban police chief. I was staying downtown with my date so we took a cab to her place. My other friends drove home in one car. That car was driven by the police chief even though it was not his car, but he drove because he said if they get pulled over, he would talk to the that cop and we will be on our way again. Note: This police chief is known to be a stickler against drunk drivers.
Russ
2:29 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
Wow!!! I guess that old saying if your not part of the solution ,you are probably part of the problem goes for some members of the police department.
Kevin
12:15 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
Mike jones:
I'll give you an example I saw last week. I'm driving on a residential side street (25 MPH speed limit in Tinley Park) I'm driving along and this cop car (no lights or sirens on) comes flying by me (scared the shit out of me, since I didn't even know were it came from) Must have been driving 60mph street that is lined with houses on both sided with front lawns facing the street. I just figured something must be up. I caught up to him since he was stopped at a very long red light. The light turned green and we both turned onto the intersecting street. His lights or siren never did come on. HHHmmmmm... if it was an emergency or something he had to get to, why no lights?, why stop at the red light? No, he was just doing 60 or so on a side street lined with residential houses and kids living in these houses. I was able to get the car# while at the stop light and I called the police station and got transferred to the police chief. He apologized for what he saw and said that he would talk to that cop about it. lol Yeah, that conversation really happened.
The thing is I see cops going way over the speed limit with no lights on, I see cops making illegal u turns many times and they never turn there lights on. I know a few cops and have for most of life and have long conversations with them. They all feel they can get out of any traffic stop, since they are a cop
MIKE JONES
9:23 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
Kevin,
A few years ago I did a "Ride Along" with a local Police Department. During that ride along I learned an enormous amount from the Officer I was with. Where I would of thought the same as you do, I learned some of the reasons that Police Officers would not use lights, in fact he explained that "in progress" calls Officers should not use lights or sirens, so not to alarm the bad guy. We also blew through lights while looking for a vehicle that was wanted (Can't remember why) without lights, it was the wrong vehicle so he just slowed down and continued driving around. I gave him a call and informed him or your observations. He said that he could not say why this happened, though there could be numerous reasons, going to a call and receiving a waive off for instance.
I got a lot out of going on the ride along with the Police Officer. I realized how much about their job I don't know (the what and why especially)
Obviously you are not a fan of the Police, but maybe doing a ride along would help in your opinion of them. Don't know if it will, but hopefully. I found this guy and the Officers working with him to be very cool. Best of luck.
HB
4:57 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
HB: So I have read through all the comments. And in trying to get a quick answer to a very detailed response, I’ve incorporated comments I’ve already read and agreed with. What disturbs me most is how people who don’t know the whole situation, know the individuals, are guessing as to if this is his first offense and predicting that there will be more, the sheer hatred that this being voiced and how people would really love to have a public hanging of this man and to have the balance of justice swing far to the other side. All I’m saying is what if it was you? What if it was your first offense and you made a really bad mistake, hoped to learn from that and hope to be given a second chance but people wanted their pound of flesh from you, felt you were unredeemable?
I agree too that we’re forgetting the victim in this case and my heart goes out to him as well and I wish him a speedy recovery and thankfully he survived that crash and can go on with his life.
First, I agree, that the punishments for DUI offenses in this state are taken entirely too lightly.
HB
4:58 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
HB continued
But that being what it is, I know some civilians who did not get jail time for first or second offenses so just because John is a cop that he should get a harsher sentence than what is dictated by the law seems to be a disparity in justice. Obviously, John Leonard has to live with this, and that will not be easy for him or his family. Their lives too will forever be changed because of this serious lack in judgment, one to drink to that extent, then to get behind the wheel and obviously his judgment was so impaired he did the one thing you shouldn’t do after a crash, leave the scene.
He messed up. But I think he got what he deserved. Also I agree with a previous statement: Second, if this man was not a cop this would not even be news. Nobody would be talking about it. Third, if this man was not a cop, he would still have his job. If he was a garbage man, electrician, plumber etc. his union would have paid for his lawyer and he would have kept his job. I for one am glad he lost his job. He deserved that because you people are right he should have known better. But with that said shouldn't every adult know better?” Ultimately since he was in the position he was in (and to have the public’s trust) and for him to leave the accident like he did that maybe his returning to that line of work would not be the best even if he had been afforded the opportunity of rehabilitation.
HB
4:58 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
HB Continued:
In the public sector someone with dependency problems gets the chance to go to rehab without losing their jobs. Should our public servants not have the same opportunity, especially if that police officers are one of the highest statistically rated professions to become alcoholics. The situations and stressors that they are put in their line of duty. Obviously, what John did was severe enough to be labeled not just a fluke but a problem and to have a problem like that and to have the Village of Tinley Park and the Tinley Park Police Department to fire him without having him seeking treatment, seems wrong. But we’ll never know if he could have sought treatment, found a second chance. I agree that the punishment he received may not satisfy the bloodlust in this room but he has already paid a price. He lost his career, he’s losing his home, his ability to take care of his family. A great majority of DUI offenders don't have happen.
Tinley 2
10:16 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
To say that people who are not in public service never get let go due to substance abuse or any other chronic physical or mental issue is not true. It is true that public service positions do get more media attention due to the very nature of the job, who they serve and who contributes to their salaries - the tax payers. The press could be good or it could be for the worse. When John's father passed, he received great well deserved positive media credits for the time he gave to the law enforcement profession. Not everyone receives that credit in the news upon their death regarding their years of hard work. So for better or for worse, the Leonard family has fortunately and unfortunately received media regarding how they contributed to this profession. The most recent mentions of course are obviously much harder to swallow.
Kevin
11:42 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
Mike, fair enough with the what you learned from the ride along, that may explain some of the stuff I see. But that does not offset what I have heard in discussions with friends of mine who are cops. It does not offset the story (mentioned in a previous post) that I witnessed first hand about a local police chief. I don't think my cop friends they lying to me or trying to act cool and exaggerating the truth, they are telling me some of the behind the scenes stuff that goes on. I don't think the cops on ride alongs would tell you any of that. No, I don't have any problems with police officers in general, I have had quite a few as friends. I have a problem with the decent handful of them that use their position as police officers to act arrogant, entitled and above the law. There are some of those on every police force. To think there is not, is completely naive.
Kevin
11:43 pm on Monday, April 23, 2012
Let me add, that Mr. Leonard is one of the cops I speak of, who is arrogant, has a sense of entitlement and acts above the law. Because of this he does not deserve the minimum sentence he received
JZ
7:30 am on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
I agree. He clearly acted above the law liquor or not, he knew who he was talking to that night and he knew what he was chasing, a chance to get let off from the incident.
Matthew
9:37 am on Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Kevin, you opinion of most cops is pretty poor, which is your right, and yet you have a lot of friends that are cops that you hang out with. And from what I've been reading in your posts their personalities are not much different than the bad cops you speak of. So why are you hanging out with these guys? Are you hoping that if you ever get in a jam and you pull out 10 cops business cards, that you too might catch a break. You know I also feel the same way but about lawyers. But guess what I don't hang out with lawyers. Talk about arrogant, self entitled people. They get more breaks in court than the cops do. ; )
Kevin
12:08 pm on Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Matthew, you really need to stop making poor assumptions since you don't know me. I'm talking on here about a very few cops in number on police forces. I believe there are a couple of these guys on every police force. Again, you would be very naive to nto think so. This is not most cops as you say. MOST cops are wonderful people. The cops I am friends with recounted their own personal stories that they have seen on police forces they work for or have worked for, They did not mention any names and I didn't ask. I really doubt my cop friends have not done any of these things.
My cop friends are few in number, not many like you're assuming. They are friends that go back along time. You assume that I would call on my cop friends to help me out of a jam. Incorrect, I have never have asked one of my cop friends for any kind of favor, that is not my style. You must have missed the post were I say that I own up to my mistakes I make in life, something Leonard does not. I have the guts on here to say what many already now is true about some cops. So no, my opinion on SOME cops is not poor at all, it is spot on, an opinion that is based on incidents I have witnessed first hand, incidents told to me by other cops, incidents that are reported on the media and just some common sense.
Kevin
12:09 pm on Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Matthew re; lawyers
There are some lawyers who are not arrogant or self entitled people, but I will agree that most fit in that category you have them in. I have only one lawyer as a friend as it is smart for everyone to have a lawyer as a friend.
Matthew
3:13 pm on Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Kevin, I will retract what I said now that you made it more clear. But in several of your posts it sounded like you where painting most cops with the same brush. During my career I have met 100's of other cops. A small percentage were total a-holes, sober. But the vast majority were decent family oriented people. I would trust most with my life as I did for many years on a daily basis. I have spoke to several of my friends on the Tinley PD who have told me Leonard was a decent guy that was well liked by most of the other officers. I am not sticking up for him because what he did and the way he acted afterwards was reprehensible. He has scarred the reputation of the Tinley Park police department and has tarnished police officers in general. But to treat him more harsh than the average offender is not fair. With that said I agree DUI offenders in general get off too easy. First offense should be automatic ignition Interlock system installed at their own expense and minor jail time. If that's not a wake up call enough then second offense should be minimum 3 months in jail. 3rd offense they should get the book thrown at them. The problem is our jails are overcrowded and jailing non violent people takes a backseat to other criminals. I'm glad the media keeps things like this alive only to help deter or make some young officers out there, with a big heads, see that with one mistake their entire career can be over in the blink of an eye.
Kevin
3:39 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
No problem Matthew. When I respond instantly like I did with those posts instead of waiting a bit and thinking about what I'm going to write, I'm sometimes mistaken or misunderstood. I reread some of those posts and I can see how it may have been unclear. I don't know Leonord, so maybe it's unfair of me to make him out to be a bad person instead of maybe a good person who used incredible poor judgement all the war around in this incident. I still don't think he should have received the minimum sentence and in part it's because he is a police officer and also to set an example. By giving him the minimum sentence it also appears to the average citizen that he is getting leniency because he is cop. Based on the responses this is how it looks to many.
JZ
7:17 am on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Sorry, I don't believe this was only caused by the influence of alcohol and a potential problem with booze. I think their is some underlying sense of entitlement in this incident with Leonard.
RonL
7:12 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Thank you to the New Lenox Police for not giving in to this man and doing the right thing. Thank you also to the Village of Tinley Park for not keeping him on the force. Leonard clearly does not know how to behave when he does not get what he wants.
fromthestreet
11:33 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
@ Ron, you are so right, good call on commending the New Lenox Police !
As for Village of Tinley Park, i don't believe they were left a choice !
fromthestreet
11:46 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
@ Ron, Sorry meant to say... "I believe they weren't left a choice !"
No Games
9:57 am on Monday, April 30, 2012
Just do not see this as all related to a personal problem with alcohol. Sorry.