patching...
Breaking: 13-year-old Frankfort Girl Missing: Police Dog Lost Scent »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Coma Punch Buddy Can Testify Without Perjury, Obstruction Charges

The star witness in the Mokena coma punch trial can testify without fear of facing criminal charges.

 

The judge in the Mokena coma punch case cleared the way for Thursday's bombshell witness to keep testifying without fear of prosecution on perjury or obstructing justice charges.

The witness, Steve Raymond of Frankfort, then returned to the witness stand to recall how he told the police "a lot of lies," including how he never saw who threw the fateful punch that put a Joliet man in a coma in July 2009.

On Thursday and Friday Raymond changed his story and said it was his friend Mike Glielmi who punched 29-year-old Eric Bartels in the face outside the Mokena bar 191 South.

Another of Raymond's friends, Joseph Messina, 24, of New Lenox, was charged with attacking Bartels and spent nearly two months in jail before bonding out. Yet Raymond kept quiet about what he says really happened, apparently telling no one else about Glielmi's guilt except for Messina's father, who also seemingly stayed silent.

A choked up Raymond, who says he considers Messina a "brother," explained that on July 1, 2011, he had a change of heart about snitching on Glielmi. That was the day his sister suffered severe brain injuries in a motorcycle accident.

"Right there, I felt Eric Bartels' pain," Raymond said, looking out at Bartels' family and friends in the gallery.

He tearfully told how he understood their "anger, and how you wanted to know the truth."

"I'm telling you guys the truth," he said. "I am."

Despite the awareness that accompanied his sister's motorcycle accident, Raymond still did not come forward with his new version of events for another year or so.

While Raymond insisted his was telling the truth, Glielmi wasn't telling anybody anything. He showed up in court with Joliet attorney Steven Haney, who said Glielmi would invoke his Fifth Amendment right not to testify since doing so would open him up to a criminal prosecution. Judge Sarah Jones then let Glielmi, who at the time of the attack lived in Manhattan but has since moved to St. Louis, go.

On the night of the attack, Raymond, Glielmi, two other young men and a young woman had taken Messina to 191 South to celebrate his birthday. A scuffle broke out as they were leaving the bar and Raymond recalled watching as Glielmi "wound up and hit (Bartels) in the face."

"The sound of his head hitting that concrete, hitting the ground, is something I'll never forget," Raymond said. "It haunts me to this day."

The Mokena police took Messina into custody even thought Raymond claims he told them they had the wrong guy. Raymond then drove their four other friends to the Mokena Police Department and from there headed to the the house where Messina lived with his parents.

While Glielmi was riding in the van Raymond was driving, Raymond said, Glielmi spoke of his guilt.

"Mike Glielmi tried saying that he made a mistake, that it should be him in the handcuffs, not Joe Messina," Raymond said. "He kept saying, 'I did it, I did it, I did it. Joe did not do it.'"

When they got to the Messina house, Raymond said, he left Glielmi outside in the van for fear of what Messina's father might do to him.

Another of the young men celebrating Messina's birthday that night, Sean Plarski, 24, told how Glielmi was "freaking out" while riding in the van.

"He was rambling on, freaking out in the back," Plarski said.

While bieng questioned by Assistant State's Attorney Michael Fitzgerald, it was revealed that during a sworn deposition Plarski said Glielmi never mentioned anything about swinging his fist or punching anyone. On the witness stand Friday, Plarski said that was true.

"I never heard him say that he struck Eric Bartels, no," Plarski said. He did say he heard Glielmi tell them, "I can't believe this happened. What did I do? I can't let Joe take the fall for this."

Plarski also noted that when Glielmi said these things from the back of the van that "it was very loud in there."

Messina attorney Dave Carlson said he may call two more witnesses when the trial resumes Monday. Prosecutors have subpoenaed Raymond's ex-girlfriend Lauren Grenda, to testify for them. Grenda was out with the men at 191 South for Messina's birthday.

Related Topics: Bar, Coma, Courts, Fight, Punch, and Trial

R.W.Voter

8:18 am on Saturday, December 8, 2012

I really think this whole case stinks, Ray Charles could tell you that this guy did it, put him away for a long time just for aggravating us. Thank you

Reply

Seriously?

8:41 am on Saturday, December 8, 2012

What a horrible move, Ed. You must be an ugly, bald, overweight coward, yourself? While I agree that Messina is responsible for what he is being accused of, it does not require a childlike lashing of words to further put him down. In America, you are innocent until proven guilty and slandering this young man is a full on cowardly move in itself. Are you really calling him names through the internet? You are one tough individual LMFAO! I hope both your comment and mine get deleted.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed

9:01 am on Saturday, December 8, 2012

I'll meet you anywhere, anytime, sweetheart and we'll see who's tough and who's not.

Comment_arrow

frank

12:42 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012

They are just trying to find "reasonable doubt"....unethical as it seems, that is the lawyer's job. This crap happens all the time....the other guy probably did do it....why else would he move to St. Louis?
I say lock 'em all up for perjury!

Patch_comments_icon

Ann C. Piasecki

9:24 am on Saturday, December 8, 2012

Good Morning Folks: I know the issue that is playing out in the courts is terribly tragic, but please don't let it spill over into your lives.

Reply

Seriously?

9:43 am on Saturday, December 8, 2012

LOL!!!! You sure act like a child, a coward with words only. Possibly a bully in your prior years? Where and when would you like to meet? I hope you are not insinuating violence with your words either. Your guilt has been presented here and your very words could be held against you. You are using the internet as your guard, congratulations! You need to do some serious growing up, sir.

Reply

John Roberts

9:48 am on Saturday, December 8, 2012

2people fighting over 2 people fighting..oh the irony..lmao

Reply

Seriously?

9:58 am on Saturday, December 8, 2012

I never realized that I was fighting with anyone, John. I think that this Ed character and his words are completely hilarious. I merely pointed out that it was improper for Ed to use name calling and I am still only offering a discussion, big difference. Name calling is a very childish thing to do. You would think that if you know how to post on a comment board of a local newspaper that you would be mature enough to use filters in writing your opinion. As Ed has shown with his prior comments, he is somewhat unable.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary Carumba

11:09 am on Saturday, December 8, 2012

It seems to me that you have as big a problem that this guy Ed has. Did you really need to respond to him in an attacking manor? You are just as guilty of everything your accusing him of.

Comment_arrow

Seriously?

11:46 am on Saturday, December 8, 2012

I disagree that it was "an attacking manor." I simply asked him a question to point out his very use of words. If it looks as if I am "attacking" him then it is obvious that words typed into a comment section do not express the true meaning of emotions; as I asked him a sarcastic question and got a threatening response. I suppose that you are ok with name calling, threats and bullying? The only way to rid the asinine comments and actions is to draw attention to the slander. If you let it go, the actions will only continue as the guilty party may not feel any wrong doing (as you are claiming I also have done). Maybe I did come off as "attacking," I didn't think so. So, for bringing this to my attention, Mary, I thank you. I really appreciate your feedback and will somehow attempt to type as to not attack. It's just a shame that this kid (Messina) has yet to be found guilty (which I believe he is) and we have people lashing out calling him childish metaphoric names as if the charges are not enough if he is not guilty.

Kathy D.

4:13 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012

Young adults go to a bar to celebrate a birthday, all of them are drinking, acting like tough guys, and punches are thrown. Drunk people do not have the best memory before, during, and after a situation. Not sure why an innocent "great" guy would run away from a situation and hide in his parent's van to avoid the police. The "new" witnessed just testified how much he lied to the police. How about erase all the testimony of the drunk friends and only listen to testimony from unbiased witnesses who witnessed the actual punch. And if my father sat on his ass for years, letting me sit in jail for months all the while knowing who was "really" responsible for punching an innocent man- what a great role model.

Reply

TJ

4:41 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012

how many people have been to a bar and got into an altercation with someone else. It happenes all the time. For something like this to happen to some one is Unfortunate. I know this "KID" (Messina) and he has always been a really nice guy and stand up friend. that is most likely the reason he did not "RAT" on any one. Give the guy a break.

Reply

R.W.Voter

5:35 pm on Saturday, December 8, 2012

I would like to know how the police lost the photos, didn't the ASA have copies, aren't the originals in the evidence room, are they just letting that get by or what? If the state loses the case, the mother can also sue the Police . Thank you

Reply

Mildred Frackenbottom

9:47 am on Monday, December 10, 2012

"Lost Photos" + "Surprise testimony" = Creative Lawyering

Reply

D Greg

12:51 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012

"Mokena coma punch case" is hard to say in the brain. Can we call this case something else?

Reply

Leave a comment